“Karma” is a word that basically translates to “action”. The implication in most people’s minds regarding the concept, however, is that for every action there is a reaction. Karma is typically thought of, then, as a kind of cosmic law that governs rewards and punishments reaped not only in a person’s present life but also his or her previous existences. Through the lens of such an idea, everything in life – from accidents and illnesses to romances and financial successes – can be interpreted as the fulfillment of Karmic contracts.
There are other schools of thought, however, that do not view Karma in terms of reward and punishment at all. Instead, it is seen as a kind of blueprint that structures a person’s experience around certain things that he or she has chosen – on a soul level – to learn over the course of a lifetime. This concept usually operates alongside another idea: that past lives influence the present one. For example, a person who has been through one existence where he enjoyed wealth and privilege may decide, for his next life, to experience many things that his wealth insulated him from the previous time around. Following from this decision he will be born, the next time, into poverty. This circumstance is considered his Karma contract, but it is intended not to punish him but rather to allow for certain learning experiences that he himself had embarked upon.
Chronic illnesses and disabilities are oftentimes interpreted in Karmic terms, particularly when they set the tone for a person’s entire life experience. Again, such conditions are sometimes interpreted as punishments for deeds committed in past lives and other times viewed as structures for learning. A person who “lived fast” in a previous existence, for example, may decide to spend her next incarnation in a wheelchair so that she can slow down and savor the things that escaped her notice previously. This second interpretation differs from the first in that no judgment is implied.
Both interpretations, however, view Karma in terms of situations, emotional realities, and consequences being carried over from one life to the next. Another theory describes Karma more as a form of energy that is responsive to our actions. This means, essentially, that what we put out into the universe will come back to us in one form or another. By such reasoning, the way to receive abundance is to give generously. This theory paints Karma as a force that binds a person’s inner reality to the life that he or she experiences out in the world. For example, an accident might be an expression of some anger that was pent up inside of the person who was involved in it – and thus, the accident was Karmic.
Karma is a very old concept that seems to have undergone many different permutations depending upon the belief systems and personal biases of the people who have embraced the idea. Some aspects remain generally consistent amongst most theories, however: the view of Karma as a force that binds human beings with the greater cosmos, that imparts a much larger significance to human action, and that serves as a framework through which we learn and grow from our experience.


